Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "
Do we need to increase the capacity of the Aberdeen Reservoir?
From the annual reports, why didn’t you use the outflow totals, which are shown on 3 of the 4 annual report snapshots you took? 22,440 ML, 18,811 ML, and 16,217 ML.
Your 18,000 ML capacity for aberdeen reservoir appears to be incorrect – on the RDNO website, the posted master water plan says it’s 10,330 ML and that raising the dam would bring it up to 22,000 ML.
“Writing a letter to the editor is easy. Writing a factual letter is a whole lot more difficult.”
Indeed.
You are correct with the last paragraph! My comments follow below.
Check out the composition of the outflow totals based on your selection of the data:
2011 total: 22,440 ML (6,359 Domestic,7,810 Agriculture, 37% Unaccounted for),
2012 total: 18,811 ML (5,720 D, 5,986 Ag 38% UAF),
2013 total 16,217 ML (6,043 D, 6,815 Ag, 29% UAF).
2014 total not provided
What use is the total outflow record? It only reflects the efficiency of the distribution system. It does not reveal the annual water demand. The annual water demand is what customers use and pay for annually. The losses due to old pipes and poor management are unintended consequences. We pay for the UAF water indirectly through our inflated water rates but have no benefit from it. Please refer to the appendices in the original report.
Note that the outflow values reflect the sum of both treatment plants not just Duteau’s.
The UAF % is reduced in 2013 and not even reported in 2014. Staff started to address the problem with apparently good results.
The capacity of the Aberdeen Reservoir is reported by GVWU staff and can be referenced here. From my interpretation the capacity is over 18,000,000 cubic meters (18,000 ML).
Feel free to correct me if you think I am wrong!
***********************************************************************************************************